2. In her article Suzie Thomas – she completed her PhD looking at relationships between archaeologists and metal detector users in England and Wales – says there are no clear statistics to show how the scale of damage from metal prospecting compares to other threats to cultural heritage. It is assumed by archaeologists that the 'unscientific extraction' of archaeological artifacts in itself, which occurs when the metal detector user digs and picks up an object from the ground, is inherently damaging. Any citizen or farmer can destroy or unearth an archaeological structure while plowing his field. This is true where 'treasure hunters' (whether or not they use a metal detector) remove an object from its archaeological context, thereby irreversibly destroying its association with structures, artifacts and other features at an archaeological site. 2, art. With similar policies, the level of cultural damage will be reduced when the concepts of treasure hunter and metal detector user are separated, when metal detector users are licensed, for example, in exchange for training, and when these people are provided to work in cooperation with archaeologists. And also, are stricter laws really causing metal detectors to drop? Or is it easier to regulate by legalizing metal prospecting and to know which artifacts were unearthed from where? He is asking his question. (Dutch Heritage Act 2016, art. We also share these concerns of archaeologists that unconscious excavations are increasing cultural damage, so recently enacted laws in the Netherlands and Flanders allowing unprofessional metal detection after a decades-long ban have imposed metal detector search activity within 30 cm of the top of the ground. However, it is not known what percentage of the people called treasure hunters are detector users. 1, Onroerend Erfgoed, 2016, hoofdstuk 33)''. restrictions were created.
Detector prices are on the rise due to foreign exchange and production supply chain crises around the world. When the fluctuations in the dollar and euro exchange rates, the pandemic and the problems in the supply chain come together, price increases are experienced throughout the world. The impact of the pandemic is not yet fully resolved. It would be better to get information by contacting for current detector prices.
As the metal grows, you can detect from the depth, and as it gets smaller, you can detect it from the surface. We often hear from you the question of whether the detector goes deep. There are different depth tests we do for deep search detectors, but of course depending on the depth logic. There are different depth tests that we perform in deep search detectors, and the final test is 350cm in the form of 1, 2, 3 meters. Depths vary according to the size of the metal, its type, the duration of being under the ground, and the soil structure.
For example, as of 2018, the Southeast Archeological Center - The Southeast Archeological Center "SEAC" - has volunteered users of metal detectors in five American Civil War parks, three Revolutionary War sites, the Red Stick (Indian) battlefield, and the War of 1812 area. archaeological research has been carried out. The Southeast Archeology Center is the support center for the National Park Service's Southeast Region. These areas include Moore's Creek battlefield, King's Mountain National Military Park, Chickamauga, and Chattanooga National Military Park. We think that it will be useful to increase the examples of some projects, institutions and government policies on a global scale to understand the importance and seriousness of the situation. These examples show us that when technology works together with academic disciplines, missing pieces can be completed quickly. The purpose of such projects is to help us understand history through the sequence of events and how the soldiers acted, thanks to the artifacts found.