The web program was created by Aalto University, the University of Helsinki and the Finnish Heritage Agency, while it is funded by the Finnish Academy. Archaeological Finds on the Semantic Web is a system that aims to encourage the collection, sharing, publication and study of archaeological finds discovered by the public. Essentially, it includes a mobile findings reporting system, a semantic portal for researchers, public and collections managers, and a Connected Open Data service for application developers to build private data analytics.
One result of their work was the enactment of a new Treasury Act in 1996, which sets guidelines for reporting findings, seeking advice from archaeologists and museum staff, and defining general government policy regarding the metal prospecting hobby. Another example is metal detection is allowed in more than 30 state parks across Washington. Metal detectors can aid in the planning of testing and excavation strategies, as they can detect buried individual metallic artifacts or concentrations of metallic artifacts, thus supplementing and informing inventory data and documentary evidence regularly used in planning excavations. Metal detectors can be used to locate areas even when there is no surface evidence. They discovered that literally tens of thousands of new finds are made by detectors in England each year. Metal detectors can also be used to study metallic artifact distribution patterns at a site without resorting to expensive and time-consuming official excavation units. Sixty-eight people worked on the 46-acre intense metal detector survey, the excavation of more than 500 targets, and the mapping of all Metal Detector finds discovered. Metal detector users must first register with Washington State Parks and comply with published regulations. These and other research examples using metal detectors as archaeological tools show that almost any archaeological site containing metal artifacts can benefit from the use of metal detectors in their investigation. Detector use by archaeologists has grown exponentially since the 1990s, and a few examples will suffice. They concluded that metal detectors can be used for good or bad, but with proper controls, the positive aspects far outweigh the negatives associated with their use in archaeological sites. Metal Detection Detector, Battle of Resaca, 2011 (from Espenshade Sullivan and Swanson 2011). In the 1990s, Dobison and Denison (1995) conducted a comprehensive review of metal prospecting and archeology in the UK.
Underground imaging systems are not like detectors and field scanning. They measure the magnetic field vectors coming from underground using magnetic sensors. The basic things that the user can learn from the data received in the underground imaging products are soft soil, void, water, fill, excavated closed place, wet ground, rock, metal, structure, tunnel, cellar, etc. is It does not overwrite the data received from the device in this way. There is no metal discrimination, the comment made by the user after the analysis of the incoming data is important. The user can reach these conclusions by analyzing the measurements he made and the data he received. The device shows the data it receives and the user tries to understand what is happening by analyzing the differences there.
Its professional staff have received certification training from the non-profit organization supported by New South Associates, which provides training in research techniques and technologies. It uses professional quality metal detectors for historical site survey and evaluation studies. Yet another organization, New South Associates, is widely recognized as one of the leading cultural resource agency advisors in the United States and is a source of pride for its contribution to historic preservation.