If we want to multiply the examples, West Bagborough the treasure was purchased from the detector is 40 thousand 650 pounds payment made by the user Somerset Museum. Other examples are as follows; Milton Keynes treasure was purchased by the British Museum and 290 thousand pounds. The historical artifacts found by the users of gold prospecting detectors are purchased by the states or museums and contribute to the tourism sector. 285 million pounds and was purchased by the Birmingham Museum from the detector user. To give an example of some magnificent historical artifacts found by users of metal detectors, this could be the Staffordshire treasure. Crosby Garrett helmet was purchased by an anonymous buyer in exchange for 2. 3 million pounds. Stirling -kolyeleri- 462 thousand pounds of torque and funded by the National Museum of Scotland toplanılarak detector was purchased from users. The Staffordshire treasure was valued at 3. Another example could be the Ringing Cup, this cup was valued at £270 thousand and this gold cup was purchased by the British Museum from the detector user who found the artifact.
There is no restriction that you can take the detector in the car or on the plane. Then you can take the detector by plane. When you want to give the detector to the aircraft, some documents are requested from you due to the battery in it. You can request these documents by contacting the company from which you purchased the detector.
However, it is not known what percentage of the people called treasure hunters are detector users. This is true where 'treasure hunters' (whether or not they use a metal detector) remove an object from its archaeological context, thereby irreversibly destroying its association with structures, artifacts and other features at an archaeological site. In her article Suzie Thomas – she completed her PhD looking at relationships between archaeologists and metal detector users in England and Wales – says there are no clear statistics to show how the scale of damage from metal prospecting compares to other threats to cultural heritage. And also, are stricter laws really causing metal detectors to drop? Or is it easier to regulate by legalizing metal prospecting and to know which artifacts were unearthed from where? He is asking his question. 2. Any citizen or farmer can destroy or unearth an archaeological structure while plowing his field. It is assumed by archaeologists that the 'unscientific extraction' of archaeological artifacts in itself, which occurs when the metal detector user digs and picks up an object from the ground, is inherently damaging. With similar policies, the level of cultural damage will be reduced when the concepts of treasure hunter and metal detector user are separated, when metal detector users are licensed, for example, in exchange for training, and when these people are provided to work in cooperation with archaeologists. 1, Onroerend Erfgoed, 2016, hoofdstuk 33)''. (Dutch Heritage Act 2016, art. We also share these concerns of archaeologists that unconscious excavations are increasing cultural damage, so recently enacted laws in the Netherlands and Flanders allowing unprofessional metal detection after a decades-long ban have imposed metal detector search activity within 30 cm of the top of the ground. 2, art. restrictions were created.
Deep search detector models, on the other hand, are not suitable for small metal prospecting. It is used to detect larger metal targets at deeper depths. Detector models are produced according to different usage areas. Detector models produced for surface metal detection are used for ring, earring, necklace, single coin and relic search.